

Summary: The World Bank announced the inauguration of a new Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline on Thursday and promised to help prevent this project from leading to poverty and corruption as such projects so often have in other poor nations.
In one of its biggest gambles, the World Bank broke precedent and put money into the high-risk $3.7 billion private oil project in an effort to prove that its development experts could reverse history and ensure that the new oil money could work for the benefit of all citizens of Chad and not just the elite.
The pipeline represents the World Bank’s single largest investment in sub-Saharan Africa. By supporting the project, the bank said it had helped ensure that oil companies did not abandon the pipeline, which crisscrosses some of the poorest and least stable countries in the world.
Ali Khadar, the director for Central Africa at the World Bank, said, ”We have put into place components to channel earnings from oil to poverty reduction, for health, education, the rural sector and to protect the environment.”
In an elaborate news conference connecting reporters and experts in Washington, London, Paris and Ndjamena, Chad, World Bank officials said that they would break the curse of oil that has brought misery to nearly every other oil-producing African nation. An oil consortium including Exxon Mobil, ChevronTexaco and Petronas, the state oil company of Malaysia, built the 665-mile pipeline and oil facilities on the Atlantic Coast and will reap more than 60 percent of the estimated $13 billion revenues over 25 years, according to World Bank estimates.
But environment advocates and human rights groups have yet to be convinced. They said the project had failed to protect labor rights and human rights and had needlessly damaged the rain forest that the pipeline traverses through Cameroon on its way to the Atlantic Ocean. Indeed, the government of Chad spent some of its signing bonus from the private oil consortium on military needs before the World Bank interceded and stopped the spending on arms.
Jon Sohn, the international campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said: ”Chad and Cameroon are failing on environmental, social and poverty alleviation grounds. Why is the World Bank using public funds to promote the oil business?”
Chad, which has a poor human rights record and is one of the world’s poorest countries, will receive an estimated $2 billion over the coming years and that is expected to double the average annual income to $550 from $250 in the next three years, according to World Bank officials.
”The whole issue of good governance is essential,” said Rashad Kaldany, the director of oil for the International Finance Corporation, which is part of the World Bank group. ”It was unprecedented that we got involved, but we wanted to see that the government created a revenue-sharing plan that was transparent with sufficient checks and balances — if we didn’t take some risks we’d never get anywhere.”
In this first venture in an oil project, the World Bank lent $92.9 million to the Chad and Cameroon governments and helped arrange another $200 million in other loans.
In return for its help, the bank worked with the Chad government to set up committees including all parts of the Chad government as well as local labor unions, human rights groups and other nongovernmental organizations charged with deciding how the oil revenue is spent and then ensuring that the revenue reached the intended beneficiaries. If the project succeeds, the officials said it may prove a model for other oil-producing countries, especially Iraq.
African oil has taken on strategic importance in the Bush administration as it looks for alternative sources of energy. The Chad project won approval from President Bill Clinton in 1998.
Susan Rice, who was then assistant secretary for African affairs at the State Department, said the administration was won over by the World Bank’s plan to transform oil from becoming an instrument of corruption and exploitation into one to improve human rights and reduce poverty.
By:20700795 Entry 12